Cross-Framework Mapping

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure RulesvsDirective (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law

See exactly how SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls map to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules maps to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law with 7% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Foreign Private Issuers(2 mappings)

SEC-FPI-1Annual Report Disclosure (Form 20-F)2 targets
WPD-PUB-01Conditions for Protected Public Disclosure
WPD-PUB-02Media Protection

Related Comparisons

Other SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules comparisons

Other Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules has 14 controls across its framework, while Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05), where 5 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls have no direct Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law equivalent.

How many controls map between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

Of 14 total SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls, 1 map directly to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

13 SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules controls have no direct equivalent in Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SEC Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules and Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Disclosure (Form 8-K Item 1.05) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.