TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token RegulationvsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)

See exactly how Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls map to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

60
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation maps to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) with 50% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 1 — Preliminary.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 60 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 1 — Preliminary(16 mappings)

POFMA-1.1Definitions and Interpretation (Sections 2-3)3 targets
→Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Data Categories
Sec. 2Interpretation7 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 35Right of Access
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Art. 8Data Categories
Sec. 3Scope and Application3 targets
→Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Data Categories
Sec. 6Establishment of the Commission3 targets
→Art. 14 quaterProtection by Design and Default
→Art. 15 terData Protection Impact Assessment
→Art. 28Administrative Measures

Part 3 — Conduct of Business(4 mappings)

Sec. 23Storage Limitation4 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 35Right of Access
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution

+40 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation comparisons

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs MiFID II / MiFIR14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Uzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Malta Data Protection Act (Cap. 586, 2018)14 mappingsSingapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation vs Barbados Data Protection Act 201913 mappings

Other Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) comparisons

Serbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsAPPI vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsPakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 2023 vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation has 28 controls across its framework, while Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 1 — Preliminary, where 6 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

Of 28 total Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls, 15 map directly to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

14 Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation controls have no direct equivalent in Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719). The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 1 — Preliminary with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Payment Services Act (PSA) — Digital Payment Token Regulation and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 1 — Preliminary (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.