Cross-Framework Mapping

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)vsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security

See exactly how Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls map to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) maps to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security with 39% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

EU-CRA-04Roles and responsibilities definition
62351-2Glossary of terms

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Access Control(3 mappings)

EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
EU-CRA-14Privileged access management
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Cryptography(4 mappings)

EU-CRA-17Encryption of data at rest
62351-9Cyber security key management
EU-CRA-18Encryption of data in transit
62351-9Cyber security key management
EU-CRA-19Certificate management
62351-9Cyber security key management
EU-CRA-20Key lifecycle management
62351-9Cyber security key management

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Operations Security(7 mappings)

EU-CRA-21Operational procedures and responsibilities2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience
EU-CRA-22Protection from malware2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience
EU-CRA-24Logging and monitoring
62351-14Cyber security event logging
EU-CRA-25Technical vulnerability management2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience

Related Comparisons

Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons

Other IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) has 31 controls across its framework, while IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management, where 5 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security equivalent.

How many controls map between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

Of 31 total Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls, 12 map directly to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

19 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.