Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security with 33% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Incident Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(4 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
62351-14Cyber security event logging
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience

OT Incident Response(1 mappings)

NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
62351-2Glossary of terms

OT System Overview and Threats(1 mappings)

NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment
62351-9Cyber security key management

OT Risk Management(3 mappings)

NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework2 targets
62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience
NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management
62351-2Glossary of terms

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

Other IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Incident Response, where 4 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 7 map directly to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

14 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Incident Response with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Incident Response (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.