Cross-Framework Mapping

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)vsCalifornia IoT Security Law

See exactly how Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls map to California IoT Security Law. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
58%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) maps to California IoT Security Law with 58% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

EU-CRA-04Roles and responsibilities definition
CA-IOT-04Roles and responsibilities definition

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management(10 mappings)

EU-CRA-07Acceptable use of assets3 targets
CA-IOT-06Asset inventory and ownership
CA-IOT-08Information classification and labeling
CA-IOT-09Asset handling procedures
EU-CRA-08Information classification and labeling
CA-IOT-08Information classification and labeling
EU-CRA-09Asset handling procedures3 targets
CA-IOT-06Asset inventory and ownership
CA-IOT-08Information classification and labeling
CA-IOT-09Asset handling procedures
EU-CRA-10Media management and disposal3 targets
CA-IOT-06Asset inventory and ownership
CA-IOT-08Information classification and labeling
CA-IOT-09Asset handling procedures

EU Cyber Resilience Act: Access Control(9 mappings)

EU-CRA-12User access management and provisioning
CA-IOT-12User access management and provisioning
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management3 targets
CA-IOT-13Authentication and password management
CA-IOT-14Privileged access management
CA-IOT-15Access review and recertification
EU-CRA-14Privileged access management3 targets
CA-IOT-13Authentication and password management
CA-IOT-14Privileged access management
CA-IOT-15Access review and recertification
EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification2 targets
CA-IOT-13Authentication and password management
CA-IOT-14Privileged access management

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and California IoT Security Law?

Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) has 31 controls across its framework, while California IoT Security Law covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies, where 4 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct California IoT Security Law equivalent.

How many controls map between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and California IoT Security Law?

Of 31 total Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls, 18 map directly to California IoT Security Law controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) to California IoT Security Law?

13 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct equivalent in California IoT Security Law. The highest concentration of gaps is in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and California IoT Security Law?

The domain with the highest gap count is EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.