Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)vsCSA CCM v4
See exactly how Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) maps to CSA CCM v4 with 58% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 54 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
EU Cyber Resilience Act: Asset Management(4 mappings)
EU Cyber Resilience Act: Access Control(16 mappings)
+34 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and CSA CCM v4?
Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) has 31 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (58% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies, where 5 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.
How many controls map between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and CSA CCM v4?
Of 31 total Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls, 18 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 58% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) to CSA CCM v4?
13 Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) and CSA CCM v4?
The domain with the highest gap count is EU Cyber Resilience Act: Information Security Policies (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.