Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsPDPA Singapore

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to PDPA Singapore. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to PDPA Singapore with 25% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Open Management and Accountability(2 mappings)

AUPRV-1APP 1 Open and Transparent Management + Privacy Management Framework2 targets
PDPASG-1Accountability, Records, DPO Appointment, and Training
PDPASG-4Children's Data, DPIA, and Privacy by Design

Use and Disclosure(1 mappings)

AUPRV-3APP 6-9 Use/Disclosure, Direct Marketing, Cross-Border, Government Identifiers
PDPASG-6Transfer Limitation, Cross-Border Safeguards, and Data Intermediary Oversight

Quality and Security(2 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information2 targets
PDPASG-2Notification, Consent, Purpose Limitation, and Lawful Basis
PDPASG-5Protection, Accuracy, and Security of Personal Data

Individual Rights(1 mappings)

AUPRV-5APP 12-13 Access and Correction of Personal Information
PDPASG-3Access, Correction, Data Portability, and Individual Rights

High-Risk Processing(3 mappings)

AUPRV-6Sensitive Information, PIA, Privacy by Design, Children3 targets
PDPASG-1Accountability, Records, DPO Appointment, and Training
PDPASG-4Children's Data, DPIA, and Privacy by Design
PDPASG-6Transfer Limitation, Cross-Border Safeguards, and Data Intermediary Oversight

Breach Response(3 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response3 targets
PDPASG-2Notification, Consent, Purpose Limitation, and Lawful Basis
PDPASG-5Protection, Accuracy, and Security of Personal Data
PDPASG-8Data Breach Notification, Incident Response, and Enforcement

Governance, Training, Enforcement(3 mappings)

AUPRV-8OAIC Cooperation, Vendor Management, Training, Complaints, Enforcement3 targets
PDPASG-1Accountability, Records, DPO Appointment, and Training
PDPASG-6Transfer Limitation, Cross-Border Safeguards, and Data Intermediary Oversight
PDPASG-7Retention Limitation, Do Not Call, Compliance, Complaints

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and PDPA Singapore?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 48 controls across its framework, while PDPA Singapore covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights, where 7 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct PDPA Singapore equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and PDPA Singapore?

Of 48 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 0 map directly to PDPA Singapore controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to PDPA Singapore?

48 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in PDPA Singapore. The highest concentration of gaps is in Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and PDPA Singapore?

The domain with the highest gap count is Privacy Act 1988 (Australia): Data Subject Rights (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.