TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)vsHITECH Act

See exactly how Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls map to HITECH Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) maps to HITECH Act with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance, Training, Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Quality and Security(1 mappings)

AUPRV-4APP 10-11 Quality, Security of Personal Information
→HITECH-Coord-HIPAA-Privacy-Security-Cures-ONCHITECH Coordination with HIPAA Privacy Rule + HIPAA Security Rule (Verified Separately) + 21st Century Cures Act + ONC

Individual Rights(2 mappings)

AUPRV-5APP 12-13 Access and Correction of Personal Information2 targets
→HITECH-Scope-ARRA-XIII-42USC-Ch156-SubtitlesHITECH Act Statutory Scope, ARRA Title XIII Origin and 42 USC Chapter 156 Structure (Subtitles A through D)
→HITECH-SubtitleA-ONC-HIT-Standards-EHR-MU-PIHITECH Subtitle A - ONC, HIT Standards Committee, EHR Certification, Meaningful Use / Promoting Interoperability

Breach Response(1 mappings)

AUPRV-7Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) Scheme, Incident Response
→HITECH-SubtitleD-Breach-Notification-BA-Direct-LiabilityHITECH Subtitle D - Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR Part 164 Subpart D), Business Associate Direct Liability, Subcontractors

Related Comparisons

Other Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) comparisons

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs India DPDP Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Jamaica Data Protection Act 20207 mappingsPrivacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs Kentucky Consumer Data Protection Act7 mappings

Other HITECH Act comparisons

Azure Security Benchmark vs HITECH Act5 mappingsLey Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs HITECH Act4 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs HITECH Act4 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs HITECH Act4 mappingsAPPI vs HITECH Act4 mappingsBahrain PDPL vs HITECH Act4 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs HITECH Act4 mappingsFederal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL) vs HITECH Act4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and HITECH Act?

Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while HITECH Act covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, Training, Enforcement, where 1 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct HITECH Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and HITECH Act?

Of 8 total Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls, 3 map directly to HITECH Act controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) to HITECH Act?

5 Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in HITECH Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance, Training, Enforcement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) and HITECH Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance, Training, Enforcement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.