PCI SSFvsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
See exactly how PCI SSF controls map to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
PCI SSF maps to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) with 24% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 PCI SSF controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
PCI SSF: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)
PCI SSF: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)
PCI SSF: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)
PCI SSF: Third-Party Risk Management(4 mappings)
PCI SSF: Incident Management & Reporting(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other PCI SSF comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between PCI SSF and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
PCI SSF has 49 controls across its framework, while FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) covers 49 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance, where 4 PCI SSF controls have no direct FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between PCI SSF and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
Of 49 total PCI SSF controls, 12 map directly to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCI SSF to FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
37 PCI SSF controls have no direct equivalent in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in PCI SSF: Information Security Governance with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between PCI SSF and FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is PCI SSF: Information Security Governance (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.