TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
83%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 83% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 6 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls identifies 1 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Metrics and Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 6 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Culture and Organization(5 mappings)

DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance5 targets
→3.2.1Account data storage is kept to a minimum through implementation of data retention and disposal policies, procedures, and processes that include at least the following: • Coverage for all locations of stored account data.
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Procedures are defined and implemented to protect cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data against disclosure and misuse that include: • Access to keys is restricted to the fewest number of custodians necessary.
→3.7.1Key-management policies and procedures are implemented to include generation of strong cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data

Implementation Practices(1 mappings)

DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists

Build and Deployment(6 mappings)

DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management6 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.3.1SAD is not stored after authorization, even if encrypted. All sensitive authentication data received is rendered unrecoverable upon completion of the authorization process
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→3.7.1Key-management policies and procedures are implemented to include generation of strong cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data

Test and Verification(5 mappings)

DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing5 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→3.7.1Key-management policies and procedures are implemented to include generation of strong cryptographic keys used to protect stored account data

Information Gathering and Monitoring(1 mappings)

DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
Coverage crosswalk

A OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls your existing OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) into NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements into OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 83% in the header counts how many OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) comparisons

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1466 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1456 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Liechtenstein DPA5 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)5 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) has 6 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (83% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Metrics and Improvement, where 1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 6 total OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls, 5 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, representing 83% coverage. The remaining 1 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

1 OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Metrics and Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Metrics and Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.