Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-92vsAzure Security Benchmark

See exactly how NIST SP 800-92 controls map to Azure Security Benchmark. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-92 maps to Azure Security Benchmark with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-92 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Log Management Programme(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-1Log Management Programme, Policy, Roles, and Operational Runbooks
ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition

Log Infrastructure(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance2 targets
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
ASB-16Virtual network segmentation

Log Management Operations(4 mappings)

NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control4 targets
ASB-06Cloud identity management
ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Log Analysis and Detection(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-5Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review2 targets
ASB-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
ASB-23Cloud vulnerability management

Log Retention and Disposition(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-6Log Retention: Policy, Tiered Storage, Backup, Secure Disposal, Legal Hold
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Privacy + Cloud/SaaS Logs(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations
ASB-11Data classification for cloud

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-92 and Azure Security Benchmark?

NIST SP 800-92 has 8 controls across its framework, while Azure Security Benchmark covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity, where 1 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct Azure Security Benchmark equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-92 and Azure Security Benchmark?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-92 controls, 6 map directly to Azure Security Benchmark controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-92 to Azure Security Benchmark?

2 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct equivalent in Azure Security Benchmark. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-92 and Azure Security Benchmark?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration with NIST Family and Maturity (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.