Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-146vsAzure Security Benchmark

See exactly how NIST SP 800-146 controls map to Azure Security Benchmark. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-146 maps to Azure Security Benchmark with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-146 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Adoption Strategy(5 mappings)

NISTSP146-1Cloud Adoption Strategy, Workload Suitability, and Decision Framework5 targets
ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition
ASB-02Cloud security policy and strategy
ASB-03Cloud risk assessment
ASB-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities
ASB-17Container and serverless security

IaaS Operational Posture(7 mappings)

NISTSP146-4IaaS Operational Recommendations and Workload Hardening7 targets
ASB-02Cloud security policy and strategy
ASB-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities
ASB-16Virtual network segmentation
ASB-17Container and serverless security
ASB-19Image and template hardening
ASB-20Cloud configuration management
ASB-24Cloud change management

Security and Privacy Posture(8 mappings)

NISTSP146-6Cloud Security and Privacy Recommendations8 targets
ASB-02Cloud security policy and strategy
ASB-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
ASB-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities
ASB-06Cloud identity management
ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ASB-11Data classification for cloud
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-146 and Azure Security Benchmark?

NIST SP 800-146 has 8 controls across its framework, while Azure Security Benchmark covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement, where 1 NIST SP 800-146 controls have no direct Azure Security Benchmark equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-146 and Azure Security Benchmark?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-146 controls, 4 map directly to Azure Security Benchmark controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-146 to Azure Security Benchmark?

4 NIST SP 800-146 controls have no direct equivalent in Azure Security Benchmark. The highest concentration of gaps is in Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-146 and Azure Security Benchmark?

The domain with the highest gap count is Audit, Cost, and Continuous Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.