Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-92vsISO 27018

See exactly how NIST SP 800-92 controls map to ISO 27018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-92 maps to ISO 27018 with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-92 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Log Management Programme(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-1Log Management Programme, Policy, Roles, and Operational Runbooks
ISO27018-01Shared responsibility model definition

Log Infrastructure(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-3Log Infrastructure: Architecture, Centralisation, Transport Security, SIEM Governance2 targets
ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
ISO27018-16Virtual network segmentation

Log Management Operations(4 mappings)

NISTSP92-4Log Management: Time Synchronisation, Parsing, Storage, Integrity, Access Control4 targets
ISO27018-06Cloud identity management
ISO27018-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
ISO27018-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ISO27018-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Log Analysis and Detection(2 mappings)

NISTSP92-5Log Analysis: Correlation, Baselining, Anomaly Detection, Alerting, Manual Review2 targets
ISO27018-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
ISO27018-23Cloud vulnerability management

Log Retention and Disposition(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-6Log Retention: Policy, Tiered Storage, Backup, Secure Disposal, Legal Hold
ISO27018-14Data backup and recovery in cloud

Privacy + Cloud/SaaS Logs(1 mappings)

NISTSP92-7Privacy in Logs, Sensitive Content Handling, Cloud and SaaS Log Considerations
ISO27018-11Data classification for cloud

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-92 and ISO 27018?

NIST SP 800-92 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27018 covers 45 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity, where 1 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct ISO 27018 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-92 and ISO 27018?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-92 controls, 6 map directly to ISO 27018 controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-92 to ISO 27018?

2 NIST SP 800-92 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration with NIST Family and Maturity with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-92 and ISO 27018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration with NIST Family and Maturity (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.