TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsGAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice with 43% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(2 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control
→AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
→GAMP5-4.1Change and Configuration Management

OT Incident Response(2 mappings)

NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment2 targets
→GAMP5-3.1User Requirements Specification
→GAMP5-3.3Design Specification

OT System Overview and Threats(9 mappings)

NIST82-OVR-01OT System Characterization
→AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process
NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment5 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-5.1Cloud Computing Validation
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment3 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment

OT Risk Management(6 mappings)

NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework3 targets
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management2 targets
→GAMP5-3.1User Requirements Specification
→GAMP5-3.3Design Specification
NIST82-RM-05OT Security Training and Awareness
→GAMP5-4.1Change and Configuration Management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Security Controls, where 5 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 9 map directly to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

12 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Security Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Security Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.