TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Incident Response and Media Protection(4 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)
3.5Securely Dispose of Data
→GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)
3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists2 targets
→GAMP5-Lifecycle-VModel-URS-FS-DS-IQOQPQV-Model Lifecycle - URS + FS + DS + IQ + OQ + PQ + Traceability
→GAMP5-Risk-CriticalThinkingRisk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts

System Protection and Communications(7 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→GAMP5-Lifecycle-VModel-URS-FS-DS-IQOQPQV-Model Lifecycle - URS + FS + DS + IQ + OQ + PQ + Traceability
→GAMP5-Risk-CriticalThinkingRisk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup3 targets
→GAMP5-Lifecycle-VModel-URS-FS-DS-IQOQPQV-Model Lifecycle - URS + FS + DS + IQ + OQ + PQ + Traceability
→GAMP5-Risk-CriticalThinkingRisk-Based Approach, Critical Thinking and 5 Key Concepts
→GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Annex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice5 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice4 mappingsUSMCA Chapter 19 - Digital Trade (United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement) vs GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 9 map directly to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

26 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.