TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsGAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(5 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment3 targets
→CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance2 targets
→GAMP5-3.1User Requirements Specification
→GAMP5-3.3Design Specification

Incident Response and Media Protection(10 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition4 targets
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
→GAMP5-5.1Cloud Computing Validation
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management4 targets
→FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach
→GAMP5-5.1Cloud Computing Validation
3.5Management of Suppliers2 targets
→FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management
→GAMP5-5.1Cloud Computing Validation

System Protection and Communications(5 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→GAMP5-4.1Change and Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→GAMP5-4.1Change and Configuration Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings2 targets
→GAMP5-3.1User Requirements Specification
→GAMP5-3.3Design Specification
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→GAMP5-3.1User Requirements Specification

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice11 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 9 map directly to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

26 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.