TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
76%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 76% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(14 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control6 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management
→AWWA-4.2Patch Management
NIST82-CTL-05OT Configuration Management
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
NIST82-CTL-06OT Malware Protection
→AWWA-4.1Malware Protection
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery3 targets
→AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing

OT Incident Response(6 mappings)

NIST82-IR-01OT Incident Response Planning3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment3 targets
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (76% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Risk Management, where 3 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 16 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 76% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

5 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Risk Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Risk Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.