TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 52% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→AWWA-2.3Account Management
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments2 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(7 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud4 targets
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
→AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
→AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring, where 3 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 13 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

12 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.