TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
75
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 13% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 77 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
→AWWA-2.3Account Management
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments2 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-16Virtual network segmentation
→AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14619 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14419 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISMAP (Japan)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsSLSA vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsPTES vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 12 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 77 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

77 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.