NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGHvsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management
See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls map to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH maps to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management with 13% coverage across 41 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 317 NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls identifies 276 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in AC Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 317 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 74 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AU Audit and Accountability(1 mappings)
CA Assessment Authorization Monitoring(11 mappings)
CM Configuration Management(2 mappings)
CP Contingency Planning(6 mappings)
+54 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 13% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH comparisons
Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH has 317 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 41 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC Access Control, where 44 NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls have no direct APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?
Of 317 total NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls, 41 map directly to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, representing 13% coverage. The remaining 276 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH to APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?
276 NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC Access Control with 44 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH and APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is AC Access Control (44 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.