Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsISO 27701:2019

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to ISO 27701:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

685
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
60%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to ISO 27701:2019 with 60% coverage across 202 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 118 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 300 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 685 mapped controls across 24 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(20 mappings)

NIST800-AC-1Access control policy and procedures4 targets
iso-27701-2019::6.11.1Security requirements of information systems
iso-27701-2019::6.2.1Management direction for information security
iso-27701-2019::6.6Access control
iso-27701-2019::6.6.1Business requirements of access control
NIST800-AC-11Device lock
iso-27701-2019::6.6.3User responsibilities
NIST800-AC-12Session control
iso-27701-2019::6.6.4System and application access control
NIST800-AC-14Permitted actions without identification or authentication2 targets
iso-27701-2019::6.6.1Business requirements of access control
iso-27701-2019::6.6.2User access management
NIST800-AC-16Security and Privacy Attributes. Provide the means to associate [organization-defined] with [organization-defined] for information in storage, in process, and/or in transmission; Ensure that the attribute associations are made and retained with the information; Establish
iso-27701-2019::6.5.2Information classification
NIST800-AC-17Remote access7 targets
iso-27701-2019::6.10Communications security
iso-27701-2019::6.10.1Network security management
iso-27701-2019::6.3.2Mobile devices and teleworking
iso-27701-2019::6.6.2User access management
iso-27701-2019::6.9.4Logging and monitoring
iso-27701-2019::7.4.9PII transmission controls
iso-27701-2019::8.4.3PII transmission controls
NIST800-AC-18Wireless access
iso-27701-2019::6.10.1Network security management
NIST800-AC-19Access control for mobile devices2 targets
iso-27701-2019::6.3.2Mobile devices and teleworking
iso-27701-2019::6.6Access control
NIST800-AC-2Account management
iso-27701-2019::6.4.2During employment

+665 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ISO 27701:2019 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27701:2019 controls your existing NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into ISO 27701:2019
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27701:2019 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
3.7%

11 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27701:2019. 289 are genuine gaps.

50%PT - PII Processing and Transparency
9.4%PM - Program Management
9.1%SI - System and Information Integrity
7.1%CM - Configuration Management
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 396 candidate mappings were examined and 339 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST800-CM-13 Data Action Mapping. Develop and document a map of system data actions

Records of PII processing document the data actions the system performs.

Grounded in iso-27701-2019::7.2.8 Records related to processing PII. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST800-AC-1 Access control policy and procedures

Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...

Every one of the 11 evidenced controls and 289 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 27701:2019 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 60% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27701:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27701:2019?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 300 controls across its framework, while ISO 27701:2019 covers 108 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 202 overlapping controls (60% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 33 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct ISO 27701:2019 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27701:2019?

Of 300 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 202 map directly to ISO 27701:2019 controls, representing 60% coverage. The remaining 118 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to ISO 27701:2019?

118 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27701:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and ISO 27701:2019?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.