TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
140
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 14% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 172 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 148 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 172 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(3 mappings)

NIST800-AC-2Account management
→E26-R5Access control
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems
→E26-R5Access control
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts
→E26-R5Access control

AU - Audit and Accountability(6 mappings)

NIST800-AU-12Audit record generation2 targets
→E26-R11Logging and audit trail
→E27-R5Security event logging
NIST800-AU-2Event logging2 targets
→E26-R11Logging and audit trail
→E27-R5Security event logging
NIST800-AU-3Content of audit records2 targets
→E26-R11Logging and audit trail
→E27-R5Security event logging

CM - Configuration Management(2 mappings)

NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses
→E27-R1System hardening
NIST800-CM-9Configuration management plan
→E27-R1System hardening

CP - Contingency Planning(4 mappings)

NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution2 targets
→E26-R15Recovery planning
→E26-R16Backup and restoration
NIST800-CP-9System backup2 targets
→E26-R15Recovery planning
→E26-R16Backup and restoration

IA - Identification and Authentication(3 mappings)

NIST800-IA-4Identifier management
→E27-R3User authentication
NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication
→E27-R3User authentication
NIST800-IA-8Identification and authentication of non-organizational users
→E27-R3User authentication

IR - Incident Response(2 mappings)

NIST800-IR-2Incident response training2 targets
→E26-R13Incident response plan
→E27-R5Security event logging

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange36 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements34 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs FedRAMP Rev 534 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v433 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)33 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges33 mappings

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 172 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 16 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

Of 172 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 24 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 148 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

148 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 16 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (16 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.