TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence SuppliersvsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems

See exactly how UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls map to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
52%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers maps to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems with 52% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Objective A: Managing Security Risk.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Objective A: Managing Security Risk(2 mappings)

A.2Risk Assessment
→E26-R3Risk assessment
A.3Asset Management
→E26-R1Asset inventory

Objective B: Protecting Against Cyber Attack(4 mappings)

B.1Access Control
→E26-R5Access control
B.2Data Protection and Encryption
→E26-R6Secure remote access
B.3Network Security
→E26-R4Network segmentation
B.4Secure Configuration
→E27-R1System hardening

Objective C: Detecting Cyber Security Events(2 mappings)

C.2Security Event Logging2 targets
→E26-R11Logging and audit trail
→E27-R5Security event logging

Cyber Risk Profiles and Assurance(1 mappings)

CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
→E26-R3Risk assessment

Objective D: Minimising Impact of Incidents(6 mappings)

D.1Incident Response Planning2 targets
→E26-R13Incident response plan
→E27-R5Security event logging
D.2Incident Reporting2 targets
→E26-R13Incident response plan
→E27-R5Security event logging
D.3Backup and Recovery2 targets
→E26-R15Recovery planning
→E26-R16Backup and restoration

Related Comparisons

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs CSA CCM v416 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs South Korea ISMS-P15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges15 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)15 mappings

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems12 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers has 21 controls across its framework, while IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Objective A: Managing Security Risk, where 3 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

Of 21 total UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls, 11 map directly to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls — representing 52% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers to IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

10 UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls have no direct equivalent in IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Objective A: Managing Security Risk with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers and IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 — Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Objective A: Managing Security Risk (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.