TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-37vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST SP 800-37 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
1
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-37 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-37 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

RMF Step 0 - Prepare(2 mappings)

NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation2 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

RMF Step 1 - Categorize(1 mappings)

NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

RMF Step 2 - Select(1 mappings)

NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest

RMF Step 6 - Monitor(3 mappings)

NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-37 comparisons

NIST SP 800-37 vs FBI CJIS Security Policy4 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers4 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System4 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20174 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation4 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs ISO 270054 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs ISO 310004 mappingsNIST SP 800-37 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence4 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-37 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST SP 800-37 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions, where 1 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-37 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-37 controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-37 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

4 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-37 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.