Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-37vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how NIST SP 800-37 controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-37 maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-37 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

RMF Step 0 - Prepare(2 mappings)

NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation2 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

RMF Step 1 - Categorize(1 mappings)

NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

RMF Step 2 - Select(1 mappings)

NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

RMF Step 6 - Monitor(2 mappings)

NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation2 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-37 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

NIST SP 800-37 has 8 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions, where 1 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-37 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-37 controls, 4 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-37 to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

4 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-37 and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.