Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-37vsISO/IEC 23894:2023

See exactly how NIST SP 800-37 controls map to ISO/IEC 23894:2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-37 maps to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-37 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

RMF Step 0 - Prepare(3 mappings)

NISTSP37-1RMF Prepare Step: Organisation-Level and System-Level Preparation3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation

RMF Step 1 - Categorize(3 mappings)

NISTSP37-2RMF Categorize Step: Information and System Categorisation3 targets
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation

RMF Step 2 - Select(3 mappings)

NISTSP37-3RMF Select Step: Security and Privacy Control Selection3 targets
ISO23894-6.3AI Risk Assessment
ISO23894-6.3.1AI Risk Identification
ISO23894-6.3.3AI Risk Evaluation

RMF Step 6 - Monitor(3 mappings)

NISTSP37-7RMF Monitor Step: Continuous Monitoring and Ongoing Authorisation3 targets
ISO23894-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO23894-5.2AI Risk Management Integration
ISO23894-5.5Framework Evaluation
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-37 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls your existing NIST SP 800-37 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-37 into ISO/IEC 23894:2023
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 23894:2023 into NIST SP 800-37
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-37 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 50% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-37 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-37 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

NIST SP 800-37 has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 23894:2023 covers 85 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions, where 1 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 23894:2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-37 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-37 controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 23894:2023 controls, representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-37 to ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

4 NIST SP 800-37 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 23894:2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-37 and ISO/IEC 23894:2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Cutting Roles and Functions (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.