Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA CCM v4vsSouth Korea ISMS-P

See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to South Korea ISMS-P. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

58
Controls Mapped
113
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA CCM v4 maps to South Korea ISMS-P with 23% coverage across 40 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 131 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 58 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(7 mappings)

CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis3 targets
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
CSA-BCR-08Backup2 targets
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(2 mappings)

CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management
CSA-CCC-08Exception management
ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(5 mappings)

CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
CSA-CEK-18Key archival
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
CSA-CEK-20Key recovery2 targets
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(6 mappings)

CSA-DSP-01Security and privacy policy and procedures3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
CSA-DSP-08Data privacy by design and default3 targets
ISMSP-PI-01Personal Information Collection
ISMSP-PI-04Cross-Border Transfer
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation

+38 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and South Korea ISMS-P?

CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while South Korea ISMS-P covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 40 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 17 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct South Korea ISMS-P equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and South Korea ISMS-P?

Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 40 map directly to South Korea ISMS-P controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 131 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to South Korea ISMS-P?

131 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea ISMS-P. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and South Korea ISMS-P?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.