Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-190vsOpen Banking Security

See exactly how NIST SP 800-190 controls map to Open Banking Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-190 maps to Open Banking Security with 16% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 NIST SP 800-190 controls identifies 38 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Orchestrator.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

NIST SP 800-190: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

NIST190-01Shared responsibility model definition
OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX

NIST SP 800-190: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

NIST190-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
NIST190-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM

NIST SP 800-190: Cloud Infrastructure Security(3 mappings)

NIST190-16Virtual network segmentation
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
NIST190-19Image and template hardening
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
NIST190-20Cloud configuration management
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management

NIST SP 800-190: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

NIST190-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-190 to Open Banking Security crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Open Banking Security controls your existing NIST SP 800-190 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-190 into Open Banking Security
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Open Banking Security into NIST SP 800-190
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-190 to Open Banking Security (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 16% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-190 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Open Banking Security controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-190 and Open Banking Security?

NIST SP 800-190 has 45 controls across its framework, while Open Banking Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Orchestrator, where 5 NIST SP 800-190 controls have no direct Open Banking Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-190 and Open Banking Security?

Of 45 total NIST SP 800-190 controls, 7 map directly to Open Banking Security controls, representing 16% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-190 to Open Banking Security?

38 NIST SP 800-190 controls have no direct equivalent in Open Banking Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Orchestrator with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-190 and Open Banking Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Orchestrator (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.