TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsOpen Banking Security

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to Open Banking Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to Open Banking Security with 34% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Incident Response and Media Protection(6 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition
→OPENBANK-4Third Party Provider (TPP) Onboarding, Directory Integration, Due Diligence
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→OPENBANK-4Third Party Provider (TPP) Onboarding, Directory Integration, Due Diligence
3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices2 targets
→OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
3.6.1Incident Response Capability2 targets
→OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX

System Protection and Communications(8 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup2 targets
→OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other Open Banking Security comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsFFIEC IT Examination Handbook vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs Open Banking Security5 mappingsISO 27019 vs Open Banking Security4 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs Open Banking Security4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Open Banking Security?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while Open Banking Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 8 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct Open Banking Security equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Open Banking Security?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 12 map directly to Open Banking Security controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to Open Banking Security?

23 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in Open Banking Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Open Banking Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.