Cross-Framework Mapping

South Korea ISMS-PvsOpen Banking Security

See exactly how South Korea ISMS-P controls map to Open Banking Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
117
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

South Korea ISMS-P maps to Open Banking Security with 6% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 126 South Korea ISMS-P controls identifies 121 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Superseded batch representation – South Korea ISMS-P.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 126 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – South Korea ISMS-P(9 mappings)

ISMSP-AC-04Network Access Control
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
ISMSP-MS-02Risk Management
→OPENBANK-4Third Party Provider (TPP) Onboarding, Directory Integration, Due Diligence
ISMSP-PI-06Personal Information Destruction
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
ISMSP-SYS-01System Hardening and Patch Management
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
ISMSP-SYS-02Encryption Implementation
→OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
ISMSP-SYS-04Vulnerability Management
→OPENBANK-2Strong Customer Authentication (SCA), Consent Lifecycle, and Customer UX
ISMSP-SYS-05Incident Response2 targets
→OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
ISMSP-SYS-06Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
Coverage crosswalk

A South Korea ISMS-P to Open Banking Security crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Open Banking Security controls your existing South Korea ISMS-P work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

South Korea ISMS-P into Open Banking Security
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Open Banking Security into South Korea ISMS-P
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

South Korea ISMS-P to Open Banking Security (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 6% in the header counts how many South Korea ISMS-P controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Open Banking Security controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between South Korea ISMS-P and Open Banking Security?

South Korea ISMS-P has 126 controls across its framework, while Open Banking Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Superseded batch representation – South Korea ISMS-P, where 17 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct Open Banking Security equivalent.

How many controls map between South Korea ISMS-P and Open Banking Security?

Of 126 total South Korea ISMS-P controls, 8 map directly to Open Banking Security controls, representing 6% coverage. The remaining 121 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping South Korea ISMS-P to Open Banking Security?

121 South Korea ISMS-P controls have no direct equivalent in Open Banking Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Superseded batch representation – South Korea ISMS-P with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between South Korea ISMS-P and Open Banking Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Superseded batch representation – South Korea ISMS-P (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.