NIST SP 800-172vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5
See exactly how NIST SP 800-172 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-172 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 with 100% coverage across 35 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SI.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 108 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
AC(11 mappings)
RA(9 mappings)
+88 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The NIST SP 800-172 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls your existing NIST SP 800-172 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-172 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 lands at 10.7%, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 into NIST SP 800-172 lands at 68.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-172 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5, the other asks the reverse.
32 of 300 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-172. 268 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Restricting access to only organization owned, provisioned or issued resources governs use of external systems.
Grounded in 3.1.2e Restrict Access to Organization-Owned, Provisioned, or Issued Information Resources. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Requires an access control policy and supporting procedures to be written, approved, issued to the personnel who must apply them, owned by a named official, and reviewed and reissued on a defined frequency and after defined trigger events,...
Every one of the 32 evidenced controls and 268 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
24 of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. 11 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Terms for external systems restrict access to resources the organization owns or authorizes.
Grounded in NIST800-AC-20 Use of external systems. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Employ dual authorization to execute critical or sensitive system and organizational operations affecting CUI.
Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 11 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-172 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-172 comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?
NIST SP 800-172 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 covers 300 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 35 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SI, where 0 NIST SP 800-172 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?
Of 35 total NIST SP 800-172 controls, 35 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-172 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?
0 NIST SP 800-172 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5. The highest concentration of gaps is in SI with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5?
The domain with the highest gap count is SI (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.