Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-172vsNIST SP 800-161 Rev 1

See exactly how NIST SP 800-172 controls map to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

110
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
100%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-172 maps to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 with 100% coverage across 35 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls identifies 0 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in SI.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 902 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 110 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 902 frameworks.

AC(10 mappings)

3.1.1eDual Authorization for Sensitive System Operations2 targets
→161R1-AC-5Separation of Duties
→161R1-AC-6Least Privilege
3.1.2eRestrict Access to Organization-Owned, Provisioned, or Issued Information Resources5 targets
→161R1-AC-19Access Control for Mobile Devices
→161R1-AC-20Use of External Systems
→161R1-AC-3Access Enforcement
→161R1-AC-6Least Privilege
→161R1-PM-17Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information on External Systems
3.1.3eEmploy Secure Information Transfer Solutions3 targets
→161R1-AC-4Information Flow Enforcement
→161R1-CA-3Information Exchange
→161R1-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

RA(10 mappings)

3.11.1eThreat-Aware Risk Assessment5 targets
→161R1-PL-8Security and Privacy Architectures
→161R1-PM-15Security and Privacy Groups and Associations
→161R1-PM-16Threat Awareness Program
→161R1-PM-28Risk Framing
→161R1-RA-3Risk Assessment
3.11.2eThreat Hunting2 targets
→161R1-RA-10Threat Hunting
→161R1-SI-4System Monitoring
3.11.3eAdvanced Automation and Analytics Capabilities2 targets
→161R1-CA-7Continuous Monitoring
→161R1-PM-31Continuous Monitoring Strategy
3.11.4eSecurity Solution Rationale Document
→161R1-CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones

+90 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 902 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST SP 800-172 to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls your existing NIST SP 800-172 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST SP 800-172 into NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 lands at 21.5%, while NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 into NIST SP 800-172 lands at 62.9%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST SP 800-172 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1, the other asks the reverse.

NIST SP 800-172 into NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1
21.5%

41 of 191 NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-172. 150 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 into NIST SP 800-172
62.9%

22 of 35 NIST SP 800-172 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 13 are genuine gaps.

NIST SP 800-172 to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 100% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-172 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 902 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 902 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

NIST SP 800-172 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 covers 191 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 35 overlapping controls (100% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SI, where 0 NIST SP 800-172 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-172 controls, 35 map directly to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 controls, representing 100% coverage. The remaining 0 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-172 to NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

0 NIST SP 800-172 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. The highest concentration of gaps is in SI with 0 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-172 and NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1?

The domain with the highest gap count is SI (0 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.