Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27019vsOpen Banking Security

See exactly how ISO 27019 controls map to Open Banking Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27019 maps to Open Banking Security with 15% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 ISO 27019 controls identifies 39 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

ISO 27019: Systems Security(2 mappings)

ISO27019-13Network security monitoring
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
ISO27019-14System security hardening
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management

ISO 27019: Incident Response & Recovery(6 mappings)

ISO27019-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions2 targets
OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
ISO27019-18Reporting obligations to authorities2 targets
OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM
ISO27019-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents2 targets
OPENBANK-7Logging, Monitoring, Regulatory Reporting, SLA, Availability
OPENBANK-8Incident Detection, Response, Customer Notification, Post-Incident Review, BCM

ISO 27019: Supply Chain & Configuration(2 mappings)

ISO27019-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
OPENBANK-4Third Party Provider (TPP) Onboarding, Directory Integration, Due Diligence
ISO27019-22Configuration management for OT systems
OPENBANK-3Mutual TLS, Token Binding, Request Signing (JWS), Key Management
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 27019 to Open Banking Security crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Open Banking Security controls your existing ISO 27019 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27019 into Open Banking Security
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Open Banking Security into ISO 27019
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27019 to Open Banking Security (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 15% in the header counts how many ISO 27019 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Open Banking Security controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27019 and Open Banking Security?

ISO 27019 has 46 controls across its framework, while Open Banking Security covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 5 ISO 27019 controls have no direct Open Banking Security equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27019 and Open Banking Security?

Of 46 total ISO 27019 controls, 7 map directly to Open Banking Security controls, representing 15% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27019 to Open Banking Security?

39 ISO 27019 controls have no direct equivalent in Open Banking Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27019 and Open Banking Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.