TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide with 23% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→CP34-TST-02Test Documentation and After-Action Reports

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
→CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization
→CP34-PLN-05Roles and Responsibilities

Incident Response and Media Protection(3 mappings)

3.6Incident Response3 targets
→CP34-FND-02Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
→CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization
→CP34-PLN-03Recovery Operations

System Protection and Communications(11 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
→CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization
→CP34-PLN-05Roles and Responsibilities
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup5 targets
→CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→CP34-FND-02Business Impact Analysis (BIA)
→CP34-FND-04Recovery Prioritization
→CP34-PLN-03Recovery Operations
→CP34-PLN-05Roles and Responsibilities
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→CP34-STR-01Backup Strategy

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons

South Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide7 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide7 mappingsDAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition) vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsBSIMM vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 10 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

27 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.