CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide
See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(11 mappings)
Information Security(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide covers 17 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 30 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide equivalent.
How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?
Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?
43 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.