TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program with 6% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment
→IRAP-8Risk Assessment

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(1 mappings)

3.9Personnel Security
→IRAP-1Australian Citizenship and Clearance

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsC-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 15 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 2 map directly to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

33 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.