TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards RulevsAustralia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program

See exactly how US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls map to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule maps to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program with 7% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Programme Governance(1 mappings)

314.4(b)Written risk assessment
→IRAP-8Risk Assessment

Testing, Service Providers and Incident Response(1 mappings)

314.4(d)Continuous monitoring and testing
→IRAP-8Risk Assessment

Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)

HIPAA-164.308(a)(3)Workforce security
→IRAP-1Australian Citizenship and Clearance

Related Comparisons

Other US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule comparisons

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation21 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments20 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)20 mappings

Other Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program comparisons

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsC-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsGLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappingsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule has 41 controls across its framework, while Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Safeguards, where 15 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls have no direct Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program equivalent.

How many controls map between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

Of 41 total US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls, 3 map directly to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule to Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

38 US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule controls have no direct equivalent in Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Safeguards with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule and Australia IRAP — Information Security Registered Assessors Program?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Safeguards (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.