TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

45
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 56% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 45 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(11 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement2 targets
→ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
→ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege2 targets
→ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)
→ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls4 targets
→ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
→ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
→ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
→ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls3 targets
→ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
→ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)
→ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(5 mappings)

171A-AT-01Assess Security Awareness Training
→ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
171A-AT-02Assess Role-Based Security Training
→ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention3 targets
→ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
→ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
→ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)

Configuration and Identification Assessment(4 mappings)

171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration3 targets
→ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)
→ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)
→ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
→ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)

+25 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange23 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.021 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappings

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents21 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents20 mappingsDISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents20 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents19 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents19 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 32 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 4 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 18 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

14 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.