TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

44
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
69%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 69% coverage across 22 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 44 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(14 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement3 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties2 targets
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege2 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls4 targets
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls3 targets
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Awareness and Training / Audit Assessment(6 mappings)

171A-AT-01Assess Security Awareness Training
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
171A-AT-02Assess Role-Based Security Training
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention2 targets
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

+24 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs CSA CCM v423 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange23 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)22 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.021 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 32 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 22 overlapping controls (69% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 4 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 22 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 69% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

10 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.