Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

84
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
72%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to CSA CCM v4 with 72% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Configuration and Identification Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 84 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control Assessment(20 mappings)

171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement4 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties3 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege3 targets
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls8 targets
CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
CSA-IVS-03Network security
CSA-UEM-10Software firewall
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls2 targets
CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
CSA-CEK-18Key archival

+64 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CSA CCM v4?

NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 32 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (72% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Configuration and Identification Assessment, where 3 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CSA CCM v4?

Of 32 total NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 23 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 72% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to CSA CCM v4?

9 NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in Configuration and Identification Assessment with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is Configuration and Identification Assessment (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.