Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-145vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how NIST SP 800-145 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-145 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-145 controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Deployment Models.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Essential Characteristics - Consumer Access(1 mappings)

NISTSP145-1On-Demand Self-Service and Broad Network Access Characteristics
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination

Essential Characteristics - Elasticity(2 mappings)

NISTSP145-3Rapid Elasticity Characteristic and Capacity Management2 targets
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
NISTSP34-4Information System Contingency Plan (ISCP) Development

Procurement and Service Catalogue Alignment(2 mappings)

NISTSP145-7Cloud Procurement Standards Aligned to NIST SP 800-145 Definition2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities

Governance, Reporting, Education(1 mappings)

NISTSP145-8Governance, Reporting, and Stakeholder Education on Cloud Definition
NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-145 comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-145 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

NIST SP 800-145 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Deployment Models, where 1 NIST SP 800-145 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-145 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-145 controls, 4 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-145 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

4 NIST SP 800-145 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Deployment Models with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-145 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Deployment Models (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.