TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

SIG (Shared Assessments)vsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how SIG (Shared Assessments) controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

SIG (Shared Assessments) maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance(2 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-1Information Governance and Risk2 targets
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding

Access Control(8 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-2Access Control, Identity, Authentication8 targets
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources

Technical Security(2 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-3Network Security, Endpoint, Data Protection2 targets
→27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection
→27010-10.1Cryptographic Protection

Vulnerability and AppSec(3 mappings)

SHAREASSESS-4Vulnerability Management, Patching, Application Security3 targets
→27010-12.2Protection from malware
→27010-13.1Communications Security
→27010-13.1Communications Security

Related Comparisons

Other SIG (Shared Assessments) comparisons

SIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO 270434 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO/SAE 214344 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.04 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27010:201510 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs ISO/IEC 27010:20157 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between SIG (Shared Assessments) and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

SIG (Shared Assessments) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cloud, where 1 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between SIG (Shared Assessments) and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 8 total SIG (Shared Assessments) controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping SIG (Shared Assessments) to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

4 SIG (Shared Assessments) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cloud with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between SIG (Shared Assessments) and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cloud (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.