Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation

See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 22% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect-P.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Govern-P (GV-P)(3 mappings)

GV.RM-PRisk Management Strategy3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework

Identify-P (ID-P)(7 mappings)

ID.DE-PData Processing Ecosystem Risk Management3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-01Board and Senior Management Oversight
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-03Third-Party Risk Management
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
ID.IM-PInventory and Mapping
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
ID.RA-PRisk Assessment3 targets
JP-FSA-CYB-GOV-02Cybersecurity Risk Assessment
KUWAIT-GOV-03Risk Management Framework
RBI-CYB-GOV-01Board-Approved Cyber Security Policy

Protect-P (PR-P)(4 mappings)

PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control
OMAN-PRO-01Identity and Access Management
PR.MA-PMaintenance
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
PR.PO-PData Protection Policies, Processes, and Procedures
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection
PR.PT-PProtective Technology
OMAN-PRO-02Data Protection

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 has 37 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect-P, where 6 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

Of 37 total NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls, 8 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

29 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect-P with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect-P (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.