TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0vsSOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination

See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls map to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 maps to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination with 50% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Control-P (CT-P).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Govern-P (GV-P)(3 mappings)

GV.RM-PRisk Management Strategy3 targets
→SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
→SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
→SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure

Identify-P (ID-P)(5 mappings)

ID.DE-PData Processing Ecosystem Risk Management3 targets
→SOC-CY-DC1Nature of Business and Operations
→SOC-CY-DC3Cybersecurity Risk Management Objectives
→SOC-CY-DC4Governance Structure
ID.IM-PInventory and Mapping
→SOC-CY-DC2Nature of Sensitive Information
ID.RA-PRisk Assessment
→SOC-CY-DC5Risk Assessment Process

Protect-P (PR-P)(6 mappings)

PR.AC-PIdentity Management, Authentication, and Access Control
→SOC-CY-S1Logical and Physical Access Controls
PR.DS-PData Security
→SOC-CY-A1Availability Commitments
PR.MA-PMaintenance
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
PR.PO-PData Protection Policies, Processes, and Procedures
→SOC-CY-C2Encryption and Data Protection
PR.PT-PProtective Technology2 targets
→SOC-CY-A1Availability Commitments
→SOC-CY-DC2Nature of Sensitive Information

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs CSA CCM v49 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework 1.09 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs EU Maritime Single Window Environment Regulation (EU) 2019/12398 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems8 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20218 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)8 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)8 mappings

Other SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination comparisons

South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination11 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 has 18 controls across its framework, while SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Control-P (CT-P), where 3 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls have no direct SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

Of 18 total NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls, 9 map directly to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 to SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

9 NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination. The highest concentration of gaps is in Control-P (CT-P) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 and SOC for Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity Risk Management Examination?

The domain with the highest gap count is Control-P (CT-P) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.