NIST Privacy Framework 1.0vsOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act
See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls map to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 maps to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act with 3% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 100 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls identifies 97 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect-P: Data Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 100 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Implementation and Use(2 mappings)
Privacy Core Functions(5 mappings)
Govern-P: Governance and Risk Management(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 comparisons
Other Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 has 100 controls across its framework, while Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect-P: Data Protection, where 24 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
Of 100 total NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls, 3 map directly to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 97 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
97 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect-P: Data Protection with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is Protect-P: Data Protection (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.