EAR — Export Administration RegulationsvsOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act
See exactly how EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls map to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EAR — Export Administration Regulations maps to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act with 5% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls identifies 61 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Compliance and Enforcement(11 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EAR — Export Administration Regulations comparisons
Other Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EAR — Export Administration Regulations and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
EAR — Export Administration Regulations has 64 controls across its framework, while Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 35 EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls have no direct Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act equivalent.
How many controls map between EAR — Export Administration Regulations and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
Of 64 total EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls, 3 map directly to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 61 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EAR — Export Administration Regulations to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
61 EAR — Export Administration Regulations controls have no direct equivalent in Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 35 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EAR — Export Administration Regulations and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (35 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.