Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global StandardsvsOwn Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act
See exactly how Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls map to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards maps to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act with 17% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Pillar 2 — Customs-to-Business Partnerships.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
AEO Eligibility and Compliance Criteria(1 mappings)
Pillar 1 — Customs-to-Customs Network Arrangements(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards comparisons
Other Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards has 18 controls across its framework, while Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Pillar 2 — Customs-to-Business Partnerships, where 6 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls have no direct Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act equivalent.
How many controls map between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
Of 18 total Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls, 3 map directly to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards to Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
15 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards controls have no direct equivalent in Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Pillar 2 — Customs-to-Business Partnerships with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes — Global Standards and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA) — NAIC Model Act?
The domain with the highest gap count is Pillar 2 — Customs-to-Business Partnerships (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.