Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0vsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0

See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls map to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

39
Controls Mapped
61
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 maps to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 with 19% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 100 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls identifies 81 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identify-P: Inventory and Mapping.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 100 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation and Use(3 mappings)

NIST-PF-IU-02CSF Alignment
BMA-14Cyber Insurance
NIST-PF-IU-03Stakeholder Engagement2 targets
CPG-6.AVendor/Supplier Cybersecurity Requirements
CPG-6.BSupply Chain Incident Reporting

Privacy Core Functions(10 mappings)

NIST-PF-PCF-01Identify-P and Govern-P
BMA-14Cyber Insurance
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P2 targets
DS-1Security Safeguards
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls
NIST-PF-PCF-03Protect-P7 targets
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
CPG-3.AEncrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
CPG-3.BEncrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection
CPG-4.CCybersecurity Awareness Training
CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS

Communicate-P: Data Processing Awareness(3 mappings)

PF-CM.AW-P4Data Retention Policies Communicated
CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection
PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework2 targets
DS-1Security Safeguards
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls

Control-P: Data Processing Management(3 mappings)

PF-CT.DM-P7Mechanisms for Transmitting Consent
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users
PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained2 targets
DS-1Security Safeguards
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls

Govern-P: Governance and Risk Management(1 mappings)

PF-GV.RM-P2Risk Tolerance Established
BMA-14Cyber Insurance

+19 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 has 100 controls across its framework, while CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identify-P: Inventory and Mapping, where 20 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

Of 100 total NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls, 19 map directly to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 81 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 to CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

81 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identify-P: Inventory and Mapping with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identify-P: Inventory and Mapping (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.