TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-144

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-144. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
92
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-144 with 12% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 93 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

DE - Detect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

GV - Govern(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Strategic opportunities (i.e., positive risks) are characterized and are included in organizational cybersecurity risk discussions
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

ID - Identify(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
→NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09The authenticity and integrity of hardware and software are assessed prior to acquisition and use
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation

PR - Protect(5 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
→NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied
→NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-04Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
→NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance

RC - Recover(3 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process2 targets
→NISTSP144-6Availability, Resilience, BCP/DR, and SLA Management
→NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance
NIST-CSF-RC.RP-06The end of incident recovery is declared based on criteria, and incident-related documentation is completed
→NISTSP144-6Availability, Resilience, BCP/DR, and SLA Management

RS - Respond(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared
→NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance
NIST-CSF-RS.MA-05The criteria for initiating incident recovery are applied
→NISTSP144-6Availability, Resilience, BCP/DR, and SLA Management
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-144 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-144 controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-144
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-144 into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-144 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 12% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-144 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5106 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP Moderate104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP High104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs SOC 2104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Information Security Manual103 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-144 comparisons

ISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST SP 800-1446 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-144?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-144 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 27 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-144 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-144?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 13 map directly to NIST SP 800-144 controls, representing 12% coverage. The remaining 93 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-144?

93 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-144. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 27 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-144?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (27 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.