Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsDFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
102
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information with 4% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 102 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

RS - Respond(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03Analysis is performed to determine what has taken place during an incident
DFARS-7012-fAccess to additional information or equipment for forensic analysis
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-07Incident data and metadata are collected and their integrity preserved
DFARS-7012-eMedia preservation and protection (90 days)
NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08Incidents are analyzed to determine root cause
DFARS-7012-gCyber incident damage assessment activities
NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents
DFARS-7012-cCyber incident reporting (72-hour rapid report)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 28 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 4 map directly to DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 102 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

102 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.