TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsCISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
89
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance with 11% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 94 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DE - Detect(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events2 targets
→CISA-ICS-7S-7Monitor and Respond
→CISA-ICS-DID-27Security Monitoring (IDS/IPS, Logging, SIEM)

GV - Govern(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed upon
→CISA-ICS-DID-21Risk Management for ICS
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→CISA-ICS-DID-28Vendor Management and Supply Chain Security

ID - Identify(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-01Inventories of hardware managed by the organization are maintained
→CISA-ICS-DID-22Asset Inventory and Risk Characterization

PR - Protect(11 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→CISA-ICS-7S-5Manage Authentication
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed
→CISA-ICS-7S-6Implement Secure Remote Access
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced
→CISA-ICS-DID-23Physical Security
NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided awareness and training to perform cybersecurity duties
→CISA-ICS-DID-29The Human Element (Awareness and Training)
NIST-CSF-PR.IR-01Networks and environments are protected from unauthorized access4 targets
→CISA-ICS-7S-3Reduce Your Attack Surface Area
→CISA-ICS-7S-4Build a Defendable Environment
→CISA-ICS-DID-24ICS Network Architecture
→CISA-ICS-DID-25Security Architecture (Perimeter, Firewalls, Diodes, Access)
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-01Configuration management practices are established and applied2 targets
→CISA-ICS-7S-1Implement Application Allowlisting (Whitelisting)
→CISA-ICS-DID-26Host Security (Patch, Field Devices, Virtual Machines)
NIST-CSF-PR.PS-02Software is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
→CISA-ICS-7S-2Ensure Proper Configuration and Patch Management

RS - Respond(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties
→CISA-ICS-7S-7Monitor and Respond

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance16 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance1 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 26 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 12 map directly to CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 94 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance?

94 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and CISA Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security Guidance?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.