TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsAPRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
88
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) with 6% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 100 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 715 frameworks | 418K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 418K+ mappings across 715 frameworks.

Govern(1 mappings)

GV.OV-01Risk management strategy outcomes are reviewed
→SPS220-44Material Risk Event Reporting

GV - Govern(16 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk5 targets
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established5 targets
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→SPS220-22Risk Identification and Assessment
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established5 targets
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-27Insurance Risk Management
→SPS220-28Risk Management Declaration
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management
→SPS220-29Operational Risk Management

ID - Identify(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
→SPS220-22Risk Identification and Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)20 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)20 mappings

Other APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) comparisons

APRA CPS 220 Risk Management vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)9 mappingsAPRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappingsIEEE 7000 vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappingsNIST SP 800-39 vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappingsNIST AI 600-1: Generative AI Profile vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 715 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 715 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (418K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 6 map directly to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 100 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

100 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.